Insolvency & Administration Dispute Accounting Expert
When a company enters insolvency, office holders and creditors frequently pursue claims against directors and connected parties. Section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986 imposes liability on directors who knew or ought to have concluded that there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation and failed to take every step to minimise loss to creditors. Dispute accountants reconstruct the company's financial position at relevant dates, analyse cash flow forecasts that were available to directors, and opine on when insolvency became inevitable and what steps a reasonable director should have taken.
Transactions at undervalue under section 238 and preferences under section 239 require analysis of whether the company received adequate consideration and whether a transaction preferred one creditor over others. The accountant values assets transferred, reviews consideration paid, examines the company's insolvency status at the transaction date, and quantifies the amount recoverable by the office holder. Connected party transactions, management buyouts, and pre-insolvency dividends demand careful review of board minutes, valuations obtained at the time, and subsequent financial deterioration.
Administration and liquidation also involve disputed proofs of debt, voidable floating charges, and claims against professional advisers. Forensic accountants support insolvency practitioners in preference payment tracing, director loan account recovery, and assessment of wrongful trading loss, typically measured as the increase in net deficit from the date when wrongful trading commenced to liquidation. Reports must be robust enough for Insolvency and Companies Court proceedings and for settlement negotiations with directors' D&O insurers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What accounting evidence is needed in wrongful trading claims?
Wrongful trading evidence includes management accounts and cash flow forecasts available to directors at material dates, board and management meeting minutes, correspondence with accountants and lenders, and analysis of when liabilities exceeded assets or the company could not pay debts as they fell due. The expert reconstructs the balance sheet and cash position over the critical period, assesses whether continued trading increased creditor loss, and quantifies the net deficit increase attributable to the continuation period. Evidence of steps taken to minimise creditor loss, such as ceasing trade, seeking investment, or appointing advisers, is reviewed against the s214 standard of the reasonably diligent director.
How does a dispute accountant analyse transactions at undervalue?
The accountant identifies the transaction, establishes the consideration received by the company, and values the asset or benefit transferred using contemporaneous valuations, market evidence, or discounted cash flow as appropriate. For section 238 claims, the analysis addresses whether the company was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the transaction, whether the transaction was at undervalue, and the period between the transaction and onset of insolvency. Schedules compare fair value to actual consideration and calculate the recoverable sum for the office holder, with clear linkage to bank payments and accounting entries in the general ledger.
Ready to Instruct a Dispute Accountant?
Submit your case details and we will match you with a qualified dispute accounting expert. Court-compliant expert reports. Response within 1 business day.
Instruct an ExpertOr email contact@disputeaccounting.com